Judge the EU future by the past? - Printable Version +- Forums (https://eu-forums.com) +-- Forum: EU Forums (https://eu-forums.com/forum-19.html) +--- Forum: General EU chat (https://eu-forums.com/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: Judge the EU future by the past? (/thread-2618.html) |
Judge the EU future by the past? - neweuropean - 06-14-2009 A Little News History... ----------------------------------- "France set to ratify Lisbon Treaty Monday, 4 February 2008 22:55 The French parliament has voted to revise the constitution, a key step towards adopting the new EU reform treaty. The ratification comes nearly three years after French voters voted against the former EU constitution in a referendum, but this time its replacement is not being put to a popular vote. Instead the Assemble Nationale and the Senate will effectively ratify the new treaty." If the people don't approve, we'll bypass them... "The Twenty-eighth Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 2008 was a proposal to amend the Constitution of Ireland in order to enable ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon (also known as the Reform Treaty) of the European Union, so it could be enacted as scheduled on 1 January 2009. As part of the enactment of the bill, a referendum was held on 12 June 2008.[1] The proposal was defeated by 53.4% to 46.6%, with a turnout of 53.1%.[2]" Originally, the legislature was going to decide, until the court forced a referendum, since it affected the constitution. If the people don't approve, we'll TRY to bypass them... "AMSTERDAM, Netherlands — The Dutch parliament's lower house has approved the Treaty of Lisbon, a series of reforms proposed for the European Union, by a wide margin. The lawmakers voted 111-39 in favor of the treaty on Thursday. It will now go to the upper house for final approval, which is seen as a formality. The treaty would reduce the number of members of the European Commission, strengthen the authority of its president and foreign policy chief and increase policy areas in which decisions could be made by majority votes rather than requiring unanimous approval. The Lisbon treaty was negotiated after voters in France and the Netherlands rejected the European Constitution in referendums in 2005. The Dutch Cabinet decided in September not to submit the new document to a referendum." If we're not sure the people will approve, we'll bypass them... Do I see a pattern here? At least the other nations were smart, by not taking a chance, and bypassing the people completely... ( Spain and Luxembourg excepted ) Now as far as I can tell by net searches, the Treaty of Lisbon was signed on 13 Dec. 2007. To be ratified by the nations on 01 Jan. 2009 by the same nations that signed the Treaty. That's what? One year and one month later? Not exactly a lot of time for people to pick a newly elected legislature in their nations if they disapprove, if there even were any national elections during that short time. And of course, in most cases, those same nations made the decision themselves. When I say nations, I mean Governmental / Legislative, not the people. What a surprise... We have a saying here, " Don't worry... We have the fox guarding the chicken house.". I'll make the Treaty. I'll sign the Treaty. And I'll ratify the Treaty... trust me... you (the people) don't need to be involved... Is this how it will always work when the EU wants something? The elite businessmen / legislative buddies just make their back-room deals and vote it in, while the people are left standing out in the cold wondering, "What just happened here...?". |