12-24-2020, 08:43 AM
What swap prices? You mean RS3 gp's exchange rate? buy RS3 gold and gold are different currencies. RS3 is in deflation, not inflation. That's why Jmod stated we do not need GE Tax such as OSRS. Meanwhile, the OSRS is the reason why they added Duel Arena Tax currently in inflation, which is, and Mod Ash proposed GE Tax. They also added the RS3 Death Mechanics aimed to carry gp from the market.
"We were in a period of deflation last year which is the complete reverse of what people believe. Inflation on large ticket items such as partyhats is not due to inflation in RS and artificial. Deep Sea Fishing sunk a lot out of money too. Invention eliminated a lot of items which could have been alched. With the Smithing rework, we are hitting this more with giving more incentive to turn things into XP rather than alching them."
Every game's supplies and demands determine solely GE costs of Bonds in each game. As it is far less difficult to earn gp and so bonds playing than OSRS RS3 they are entirely different things. RS3 bonds may buy a lot of items OSRS bonds ca. Hence RS3 bonds' demand are much much higher and therefore does its GE price. We are talking about paying to win when we speak about pay-to-win. The only way to compare the two games would be to compare how much real cash are actual players paying to"win" as it costs exactly the same amount of REAL MONEY to purchase a RS3 and OSRS Bond. As I mentioned, most old school players think they"win" by getting the endgame or BiS equipment. So it is very obvious OSRS is far than RS3 in that respect.
Within my RS3 account I have"achieved" 99 in prayer, herb, summoning and some other skills. 100% bonus exp not including all the lamp promotions I got and protean products. I obtained every single Skilling outfit aswell as 90% of the lucky items. I've been given cash to never ever have to do anything to earn money within reason. All while hardly knowing a thing about ending game content beyond god wars 2 and 1. My verdict? 100% pay to win.
Now, osrs account? Double the time played, foundation 80 that I grinded for, for 4 months. Around ￡50 spent on RuneScape at the past year and a half (I purchased several bonds during the balances early levels before I could create my own OSRS gold) plenty more things to go at the even if I invested ￡1000 on bonds I'd still have to grind something, only with better armour and weapons. My verdict? Not pay to win at all, buying bonds is not currently paying to acquire RuneScape, it pays to get an item to be used in RuneScape. I have played osrs and RS3 for many years and that made me laugh so much! Saying osrs is pay to acquire is nothing short of funny although I like both matches!
"We were in a period of deflation last year which is the complete reverse of what people believe. Inflation on large ticket items such as partyhats is not due to inflation in RS and artificial. Deep Sea Fishing sunk a lot out of money too. Invention eliminated a lot of items which could have been alched. With the Smithing rework, we are hitting this more with giving more incentive to turn things into XP rather than alching them."
Every game's supplies and demands determine solely GE costs of Bonds in each game. As it is far less difficult to earn gp and so bonds playing than OSRS RS3 they are entirely different things. RS3 bonds may buy a lot of items OSRS bonds ca. Hence RS3 bonds' demand are much much higher and therefore does its GE price. We are talking about paying to win when we speak about pay-to-win. The only way to compare the two games would be to compare how much real cash are actual players paying to"win" as it costs exactly the same amount of REAL MONEY to purchase a RS3 and OSRS Bond. As I mentioned, most old school players think they"win" by getting the endgame or BiS equipment. So it is very obvious OSRS is far than RS3 in that respect.
Within my RS3 account I have"achieved" 99 in prayer, herb, summoning and some other skills. 100% bonus exp not including all the lamp promotions I got and protean products. I obtained every single Skilling outfit aswell as 90% of the lucky items. I've been given cash to never ever have to do anything to earn money within reason. All while hardly knowing a thing about ending game content beyond god wars 2 and 1. My verdict? 100% pay to win.
Now, osrs account? Double the time played, foundation 80 that I grinded for, for 4 months. Around ￡50 spent on RuneScape at the past year and a half (I purchased several bonds during the balances early levels before I could create my own OSRS gold) plenty more things to go at the even if I invested ￡1000 on bonds I'd still have to grind something, only with better armour and weapons. My verdict? Not pay to win at all, buying bonds is not currently paying to acquire RuneScape, it pays to get an item to be used in RuneScape. I have played osrs and RS3 for many years and that made me laugh so much! Saying osrs is pay to acquire is nothing short of funny although I like both matches!