Poll: Who strated the war in Ossetia: Georgia or Russia?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Georgia
43.36%
62 43.36%
Russia
55.24%
79 55.24%
I don't know
1.40%
2 1.40%
Total 143 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who started the war in S.Ossetia: Georgia or Russia?
Tamsa Wrote:Harvard Conference about Circassians
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.radoiadiga.com/adigaislam/Circa...RENCE/index.php">http://www.radoiadiga.com/adigaislam/Ci ... /index.php</a><!-- m -->

William Paterson University Conference about Circassians
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://eng.radioadiga.com/WPUConference.ph...17359&hl=en">http://eng.radioadiga.com/WPUConference ... 7359&hl=en</a><!-- m -->

The Circassians: Past, Present and Future
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.radoiadiga.com/video/PastPresentFuture.php">http://www.radoiadiga.com/video/PastPresentFuture.php</a><!-- m -->

Tamsa what's wrong with these links? I can't open them? What is it about?

This is how russian hackers deal with democracy

What is war? I have not voted on who started the war because I am not sure what is meant by the question. You have to define the meaning of war first. Then you have to be sure when it started. What was before the war? Was it peace? There are people who might think peace always exists between and before wars but others would argue that mere absence of war does not mean peace. Sometimes the question matters more than the answer. If one asks secondary or even wrong questions, what answers can be expected? But the better input the better output. I’d like to know how long ago there was peace in this region.
Karl.in.eu Wrote:This is how russian hackers deal with democracy
The link <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://eng.radioadiga.com/">http://eng.radioadiga.com/</a><!-- m --> works
I also found <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.adygaunion.com/eng/">http://www.adygaunion.com/eng/</a><!-- m --> , I read some articles on this site and I found there are certainly many things that should be commented on

specially for you Yalta
war is open armed conflict between two or more parties, nations, or states.
I think there is no response for the question of this topic because the roots begin too much before we existed.
"I believe in making the world safe for our children, but not our children's children, because I don't think children should be having sex." Smile

Web Design Forums - Server-Side Web and Software Development discussions

I think that the actual war was officially started by Georgia. There is a possibility that they reacted to provocative acts from S. Ossetian militia, or as a retaliation to Russian troops pooring into S. Ossetia (although I don't see how launching an attack on Tsinkvali would resolve that issue).
However the actual conflict I believe was started by the stupid leadership of the USSR, who divided Ossetia in two for somme bizzare reason.

freevoice Wrote:I think that the actual war was officially started by Georgia. There is a possibility that they reacted to provocative acts from S. Ossetian militia, or as a retaliation to Russian troops pooring into S. Ossetia (although I don't see how launching an attack on Tsinkvali would resolve that issue).
However the actual conflict I believe was started by the stupid leadership of the USSR, who divided Ossetia in two for somme bizzare reason.
Rather than being some bizarre reason, it was a sophisticated calculation. Hostage taking.

Yalta1945 Wrote:
freevoice Wrote:I think that the actual war was officially started by Georgia. There is a possibility that they reacted to provocative acts from S. Ossetian militia, or as a retaliation to Russian troops pooring into S. Ossetia (although I don't see how launching an attack on Tsinkvali would resolve that issue).
However the actual conflict I believe was started by the stupid leadership of the USSR, who divided Ossetia in two for somme bizzare reason.
Rather than being some bizarre reason, it was a sophisticated calculation. Hostage taking.
Didn't know about that, but considering the problems it has caused I still think it was a dumb decision.

Steven Wrote:specially for you Yalta
war is open armed conflict between two or more parties, nations, or states.
Does Kokoity's "party" mean "Russia"?
Steven Wrote:I think there is no response for the question of this topic because the roots begin too much before we existed.
Which part of the Bible do you refer to? 8-)

It is still uncertain who exactly started it, since the whole investigation is incomplete, but what I would like to know is who caused a similar war in the 90's, which eventually lead to this.

Freevoice, doubtlessly stupid leadership of the USSR didn't divide Ossetia at all. It created South Ossetia in April 1922 on Georgian land and chose Tskhinvali as it administrative center. Tskhinvali is a Georgian word and means 'a land of hornbeams' since there are indeed a lot of these trees in this region. Now Ossetians and their Russian patrons cross out the last letter from the city name so as to hide its real etymology. Ossetians according to the 1922 census constituted only 11% in this city.The expansion of Ossetians under the Soviet rule was astonishing - they even got some Ingushetian lands after the latter were expelled in 1944 - which turned them into super-privileged people in the Communist Empire. Taken into account the Soviet policy which didn't care about national borders at all (Russian lands given to Kazakhstan, Tajik cultural centres handed over to Uzbekistan etc), tragedies of the present time can be traced back to early 1920s.
Therefore Russia has not divided but almost tripled the territory owned by Ossetians before this period and now got busy to legalize this expansion.

freevoice Wrote:It is still uncertain who exactly started it, since the whole investigation is incomplete, but what I would like to know is who caused a similar war in the 90's, which eventually lead to this.

Georgia of course. S Osetia and Abkchazia wanted to be independent, georgia answered with force.

It was the legal right of the people of Abkhazia and S.Osettia to choose to be independent. Georgia has no knowledge of international law.

Nicholas Wrote:It was the legal right of the people of Abkhazia and S.Osettia to choose to be independent. Georgia has no knowledge of international law.
I've been wondering if anybody protest that E.Kokoity's a puppet of Kremlin...

It seams that your english is not that good. You meant leader

By asking how long ago there was peace in this region I bore in mind that we called it war when the conflict escalated but we had tolerated it when they had been shooting each other occasionally at nights - is it ok?

Kokoity, Zyazikov and Kadyrov are all deranged faces of Putin, worse patterns of puppet Najibullah. Baghapsh of Abkhazians seems decent though.
In order to answer a question whether who started this war one should believe "Vesti" much less, but instead see maps and read historical documents. The war definitely didn't break out on August 7

Like one of our leader said " Georgia isn't a state it is miserable protectorate..." Every day I understand it more and more. But your master have some problems in economics, may be they simply forgot about their parishioners?
The best political regime for the nation is a regime which was saved this nation like an entire one. (M. Montein)

You Ivan better quote less of your bloodthirsty leaders and wider look around for your proxies: Kokoity, Hamas, Sandinistas, Hizbullahis, in perspective probably 'Taleban', North Korea and all imaginable odious forces existing on Earth

gomboreli Wrote:You Ivan better quote less of your bloodthirsty leaders and wider look around for your proxies: Kokoity, Hamas, Sandinistas, Hizbullahis, in perspective probably 'Taleban', North Korea and all imaginable odious forces existing on Earth

Main thing that we can act on our own we should not go for promission to Bush. That is called indepandance.

SiD Wrote:
gomboreli Wrote:You Ivan better quote less of your bloodthirsty leaders and wider look around for your proxies: Kokoity, Hamas, Sandinistas, Hizbullahis, in perspective probably 'Taleban', North Korea and all imaginable odious forces existing on Earth

Main thing that we can act on our own we should not go for promission to Bush. That is called indepandance.
What would Freud say about it? You know, these unconscious slipperies in language...

I would call it simple mistake.

SiD Wrote:Main thing that we can act on our own we should not go for promission to Bush. That is called indepandance.
Yalta1945 Wrote:What would Freud say about it? You know, these unconscious slipperies in language...

SiD Wrote:I would call it simple mistake.
O.K. According to Freud, these mistakes are not simple - they reveal us smth about a mistaker.
You may make such mistake when you think "in the fan dance."
Explanation: fan dance := a solo dance performed by a nude or nearly nude woman using fans for covering.

Yalta1945 Wrote:
SiD Wrote:Main thing that we can act on our own we should not go for promission to Bush. That is called indepandance.
Yalta1945 Wrote:What would Freud say about it? You know, these unconscious slipperies in language...

SiD Wrote:I would call it simple mistake.
O.K. According to Freud, these mistakes are not simple - they reveal us smth about a mistaker.
You may make such mistake when you think "in the fan dance."
Explanation: fan dance := a solo dance performed by a nude or nearly nude woman using fans for covering.

I suppose Freud explain it coming from subconscious... One don't "think" subconsciousnessly.
And it appears in spoken language not written.
So I believe SiD was right thinking it was a simple mistake

independent Wrote:
Yalta1945 Wrote:
SiD Wrote:Main thing that we can act on our own we should not go for promission to Bush. That is called indepandance.
Yalta1945 Wrote:What would Freud say about it? You know, these unconscious slipperies in language...

SiD Wrote:I would call it simple mistake.
O.K. According to Freud, these mistakes are not simple - they reveal us smth about a mistaker.
You may make such mistake when you think "in the fan dance."
Explanation: fan dance := a solo dance performed by a nude or nearly nude woman using fans for covering.

I suppose Freud explain it coming from subconscious... One don't "think" subconsciousnessly.
And it appears in spoken language not written.
So I believe SiD was right thinking it was a simple mistake
Maybe. But writing is connected to speaking, and subconscious is sub-conscious. Consciousness is like turning on the light to the darkness of the sub-conscious. I do use the enlarged meaning for "thinking" because I can solve very technical tasks without thinking of them consciously. It means "brains" work while I take a rest. If it is not "thinking", then what?

Yalta1945 Wrote:IMaybe. But writing is connected to speaking, and subconscious is sub-conscious. Consciousness is like turning on the light to the darkness of the sub-conscious. I do use the enlarged meaning for "thinking" because I can solve very technical tasks without thinking of them consciously. It means "brains" work while I take a rest. If it is not "thinking", then what?

Just for you i will open you great secret. I think in Russian lenquege. But i should write in english dont i? I dont claim that i am good in english so there could be mistakes. Do you need to be genius to understand such simple thing?



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Georgia and South Ossetia at war John 2,391 929,920 10-18-2009, 08:48 AM
Last Post: Admin_phpbb3_import1



Users browsing this thread:
10 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.